How western Uganda handed Museveni 6th term victory

President Museveni scored more than 70 percent in 51 districts, polling 2.69 million votes of the 3.21 million valid votes cast in those districts. 

This score represents about 44 percent of 6.04 million votes Museveni polled in the January 14 presidential elections, according to the final tally of results released by the Electoral Commission (EC).

At least 31 of these districts are in western Uganda, and they include districts such as Kiruhura—the president’s home district—where he scored 98.7 percent, and  Kazo—curved out of Kiruhura—where he scored 98 percent. 

Museveni scored above 90 percent in the Karamoja districts of Napak, Nakapiripirit, Amudat and Karenga – areas that he has traditionally.

He also scored above 90 percent in western districts of Kamwenge, Isingiro and Kisoro.

Interestingly, the districts Museveni won are also the districts that registered highest voter turnout.

For instance, Kiruhura had a 93 percent voter turnout, Kazo 81, Kamwenge 78 percent and Isingiro 87 percent.  

In the 2016 presidential election, Kiruhura (Kazo was part of it) had 86 percent voter turnout, Kamwenge 71 percent and Insigiro 70 percent.    

There have been allegations of ballot stuffing in western Uganda: video clips of people ticking more than one ballot papers, speaking Runyankole have been circulating online.  

EC chairman, Simon Byabakama says they canceled results of 83 polling stations because of allegations of ballot stuffing, grabbing of polling materials, declaration of result (DR) not being delivered, total votes cast exceeding number of registered voters and acts of hooliganism.

But most of these polling stations where results were canceled such as Kampala, Wakiso and Mukono were won by Bobi Wine.Sembabule is the only district among those won by Museveni where results from a number of polling stations were cancelled.

NRM supporters cheering Museveni


In western Uganda, the commission annulled results of two polling stations: one in Isingiro and another in Bundibugyo. 

Contrary to Karamoja, the western Uganda districts were consequential in handing Museveni victory due to high number of registered voters.

This voter turnout was vital in this election where national voter turnout was 59.3 percent, according to election data.   Its only one Buganda district-Lyantonde where Museveni scored above 70 percent.

Interestingly also, Museveni’s closest challenger—pop-star turned politician—Robert Kyagulanyi lost heavily in districts with a high voter turnout.

He only scored above 20 percent in two districts that registered more than 70 percent turnout: Butebo and Bulambuli.  

Bobi Wine’s best score in a district with high voter turnout is Gomba where he polled 53 percent and the district had 68 voter turnout, Butambala where he polled 73 percent had a 67 percent voter turnout, while Mityana where he won with 64 percent had 65 percent voter turnout. 

Districts that had a high number of registered voters and won by Bobi Wine such as Kampala and Wakiso had less than 50 percent voter turnout according to EC records.

Museveni stronghold

Western Uganda is a region Museveni has been winning since 1996 when the country returned to electoral democracy. For the four times that Forum for Democratic Change (FDC’s) Dr Kizza Besigye challenged Museveni, he won only two districts in western Uganda—Kasese (2006 and 2016) and Rukungiri—his home district in 2016.

Apart from these districts, Besigye managed to poll more than 30 percent only in Mitooma, Ntungamo and Kabale districts in 2016 election.
  
Prior to January 14 elections, Bernard Sabiti, a researcher and public policy analyst argued Museveni has had substantial support in western Uganda over years that disadvantaged the opposition.

 “It is being naïve to say Museveni has no support at all. That is not true. There is genuine support for the president especially in the countryside and particularly in western Uganda,”  Sabiiti said.

Both Sabiti and Mwambutsya Ndebeesa, a political scientist at Makerere University argued that NRM has leveraged patronage and state machinery to tempt politicians who walk away back into its fold but also frustrate organizational capabilities of opposition parties in western Uganda.

URN
SHARE

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.